Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Interesting Information About Procedure vs. Style In Graffiti

By Rashad Brown


It is essential to clarify the distinction between method and style. Technique is actually a means, not an finish. It can be the hammers and saws with which one builds the house - not the home itself. Method enables one such freedoms as to blend colors cleanly, to draw letters that function when it comes to classical perspective, or to outline without having dripping. One of the prospective drawbacks of technique is that it enables 1 to exactly replicate the work of other people if one so desires.

In graffiti, there's a large distinction between strategy and style. Method is the way in which something is created, whereas style is the final result. An excellent technique is the capacity to paint with out dripping, to paint clean lines, mix colours, and to draw. Although method is a very good factor, it can trigger troubles because it enables the ability to copy other individual's function.

Technique is something which might be taught, but style is some thing which should be discovered within one's self. Approach is universal, style is personal.

Simply because technique and style are two quite various aspects of graffiti, new artists are occasionally unsure as to which has to be studied very first. Approach is considered to be less complicated to find out simply because it can develop easier through learning, practice and time.

Several graffiti writers make the mistake of learning method first, to be able to make their pieces fairly, and believe that style can somehow wait until they have the indicates to express it in a way that is technically pretty. This is a grave mistake. The very first factor any writer should do is create their own style, for with out it they will create shallow artwork, regardless of how technically advanced it's.

Obviously, everybody copies style in the beginning, and that's okay. You'll find "basics" to discover in graffiti, just like any other art form. Several great graffiti writers got their start by basing their work on the style of their nearby heroes, but then, initial lessons learned, they moved on to establish their own.

It's indeed a beautiful sight to see individual writers make leaps and bounds as they create their very own voice and develop on the work of their elders. However, what is infuriating is when graffiti writers young or old feel that their good results could be achieved by developing a collage of other writers' styles.

These men and women only fool the ignorant. A classic trick of the style-less writer is to choose one of their favorite graffiti heroes and shape into their very own name the letters that their hero has worked so tirelessly to best in an individual style.

This copying is demeaning towards the copier and copied too. It demeans the copied due to the fact they lose their power more than their work, and their work losses its' originality and uniqueness. For the copier it can be demeaning simply because they lose their legitimacy as a graffiti artist.

Every and every graffiti writer has been given the tremendous gift of a substantial culture and art form which has allowed for their expression along with the capability to say points previously unsayable. That's 1 hell of a debt to carry, but each and every writer can do something about repaying it. The most effective way to repay the culture is to contribute some thing individual and special back to it.




About the Author:



No comments:

Post a Comment