Listing the top ten best web hosts is an extraordinarily difficult task. Many variations of these lists can be found, but it is important to know the method behind creating them. Knowing how these groups of hosting solutions have been formed is the way to better understand which option is optimal for a person and their needs. The end result without finding this out can be chaos and confusion.
Being able to work back through how a table of best hosting providers has been formed is useful. People can therefore decide on their own terms which host would be best for them. Some top ten lists work on a cost basis.
That is useful for people who are looking for budget hosting solutions. However, the cheapest hosting companies may cut back on other options such as SQL databases and Perl script accessibility. If a website relies on these, then it is a false economy to choose a certain company to host a website when the site will not work.
Similarly, another form of top hosting providers list may group the companies in terms of the level of downtime for their hosting. Sites which rarely see downtime would rank highly. That, while important, is not the most important thing for many people though.
The way to upload files - whether via file transfer protocol, also known as FTP, or through an online user interface - will matter to some. Those who have to upload hundreds of files a day to their server will need the FTP access provided by some hosts. However if there is a site with few files which is rarely updated, then a web service based in a browser may suffice.
The level of traffic a host can handle before their servers capitulate and throw up 404 errors is important too. Space constraints may matter to some sites which are media heavy, uploading many videos and photos, but not to others. Knowing all this before embarking on a hosting contract is important to find out.
Simply put, top ten best web hosts lists are very useful. But they should be used as a stepping off point for further research, rather than the sole answer. Finding a good host is better with the personal touch.
Being able to work back through how a table of best hosting providers has been formed is useful. People can therefore decide on their own terms which host would be best for them. Some top ten lists work on a cost basis.
That is useful for people who are looking for budget hosting solutions. However, the cheapest hosting companies may cut back on other options such as SQL databases and Perl script accessibility. If a website relies on these, then it is a false economy to choose a certain company to host a website when the site will not work.
Similarly, another form of top hosting providers list may group the companies in terms of the level of downtime for their hosting. Sites which rarely see downtime would rank highly. That, while important, is not the most important thing for many people though.
The way to upload files - whether via file transfer protocol, also known as FTP, or through an online user interface - will matter to some. Those who have to upload hundreds of files a day to their server will need the FTP access provided by some hosts. However if there is a site with few files which is rarely updated, then a web service based in a browser may suffice.
The level of traffic a host can handle before their servers capitulate and throw up 404 errors is important too. Space constraints may matter to some sites which are media heavy, uploading many videos and photos, but not to others. Knowing all this before embarking on a hosting contract is important to find out.
Simply put, top ten best web hosts lists are very useful. But they should be used as a stepping off point for further research, rather than the sole answer. Finding a good host is better with the personal touch.
No comments:
Post a Comment